[Linux-Xtensa] [PATCH] gpio: xtensa: depend on HAVE_XTENSA_GPIO32
baruch at tkos.co.il
Thu Jan 2 13:33:33 UTC 2014
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 02:21:12PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Baruch Siach <baruch at tkos.co.il> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 01:07:24PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Baruch Siach <baruch at tkos.co.il> wrote:
> >> > Prevent build failure when the selected variant does not support GPIO32.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch at tkos.co.il>
> >> (...)
> >> > +config HAVE_XTENSA_GPIO32
> >> > + bool
> >> > +
> >> > config GPIO_XTENSA
> >> > bool "Xtensa GPIO32 support"
> >> > depends on XTENSA
> >> > + depends on HAVE_XTENSA_GPIO32
> >> This is just a tautology, you don't need a helper bool
> >> for this.
> >> Instead just select GPIO_XTENSA from your affected
> >> platforms.
> > But then you force this driver on all users. Why not leave the option to
> > disable this driver when the user needs direct access to this hardware, or
> > just wants to remove unused code?
> Hmm you're right. But if the build fails on !XTENSA, can you not
> put a
> depends on XTENSA_VARIANT_FSF || XTENSA_VARIANT_DC232B || XTENSA_VARIANT_DC233C
> Into drivers/gpio/Kconfig?
> It's a simple oneliner...
IMO, having a 'select HAVE_XTENSA_GPIO32' in arch/xtensa/Kconfig would makes
it clear that this is something to consider when adding another Xtensa
variant. Also, this dependency line might (hopefully will) become quite long.
But if you object I'll change that.
> Usually the only reason not to do this would be to get a wider compile
> coverage but the patch says it only compiles on these platforms
> anyway :-P
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
- baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
More information about the linux-xtensa